Tuesday, 13 October 2015

Representation Of Gender




Discuss the ways in which the extract constructs the representation of gender using the following:



  • Camera shots, angles, movement and composition
  • Editing
  • Sound
  • Mise en scène

Camera Shots, Angles, Movements and Composition


The extract of Alice & Luther is constructed through multiple camera shots. The scene starts off with an establishing shot, which is interpreted as a close up of Alice, out in the streets, facing the side of the camera. This emphasizes that the female is going to be the main attention within the scene, as she is the first character to appear. Stereotypically, you wouldn't usually see this happen, as the male character 'normally' obtains the main attention within a TV drama.

The scene then transitions into another close up/birds eye view, this time emphasizing Alice's bag, which contains her dog's ashes. This is still keeping the attention on the female character, as the scene now focuses on her possession, rather than skipping onto the male character of the scene who she is talking to. Again, stereotypically, you wouldn't usually see this happen within TV dramas, as there has been no attention on the male character at all in the scene yet, when 'normally' he would have the main attention for a majority of the time that the scene is taking place. 

Perhaps the idea of a possession being shown before the male suggests that the female is more important than the male in this scene, and they want to exaggerate that idea, by keeping the male character a mystery for the first 5 seconds. This is questioning the true stereotypical sense of male and female characters and their dominance as different genders, as their roles have been reversed from what we would know to be 'expected' within a TV drama clip (this being the male as the more dominant, with the female being more of a side character). 

The scene then transitions into a close up, this time of the male character. The movement of the camera seems pretty still during this transition, whereas with the woman and her bag, the movement seems to be pretty slick and smooth. Perhaps this could hint at both the man and the woman's attitudes/personalities, as the woman comes across as sly through her facial reactions (and this is emphasized by smooth camera movements, that could hint that her methods are smooth as well, as she needs to keep her plans hidden from the male), and the man seems to come across as dull and straight to the point through his facial reactions (and this is emphasized by a straight forward camera transition, as he needs to get on with his task, without messing around wasting time). This part of the clip blends in with the stereotypical traits of a male character within a TV drama unlike the part before, as he is now starting to get a lot of attention within the scene, just like a male character would be expected to get.

The next part of the scene then transitions into a mixture of long shot/two shots of the characters and then back to close ups. This is revealing a bit more about their location outside on the streets, by presenting the location from a wide angle, before then transitioning into another close up, this time in a brand new location which would appear to be Alice's house, presented with a high angle shot at first. Their is more emphasis on the dog's ashes in the second location with this high angle shot, again showing that the male is the lesser important character within this scene, as it is still focusing around the female and her possessions. Alice is then emphasized even more as a sly character, with more smooth camera transitions, whilst Luther continues to maintain within shots that just get straight to the focal point. Bare in mind how Alice is the antagonist and Luther is the protagonist, and that these sorts of camera shots/angles would be common for the villain and the hero.

Later on within the scene, an over the shoulder shot is used to show the conversation deepening between Alice and Luther within Alice's home. This show's us the perspective of the room that Luther sees, as it is his shoulder we see everything from. However, even though it is from his perspective, we could still see this as the female being the more important character within the scene, as the focus is all on her through what we are seeing within the shot. 

These shots continue to occur throughout the rest of the scene, mixing and matching to show different aspects of the room, and each character's own individual plans for being there. The close ups tend to focus more on the character's facial expressions, whilst the mid shots/long shots tend to focus more on the surroundings of the room, potentially for any clues that could be given away. 


Editing



Within this extract, there is a lot of editing that occurs. A majority of the shots that occur tend to be edited into short takes, to potentially show that there is a bit of mystery about what is going on between the two characters. These short takes tend to happen through the camera focusing just on one character by being emphasized with a close up, and then go straight onto the next character with another emphasized close up. The use of these short takes could suggest, that both characters are very important and powerful, as they both get a lot of camera time, focusing on only themselves within certain shots. 


However, this could also be showing the representation of males to come across potentially weaker than usual within a TV Drama extract, as the male is struggling to maintain the lead role within this scene, and within the conversation as a whole, making the woman appear stronger.

A lot of shot reverse shots are used as well, to show that each character is constantly looking at each other through the scene, potentially in a battle for dominance between each other in the conversation. This again gives both genders a bit of control and power within this extract. 

Once the scene changes from outside and into Alice's house, the focus begins to zoom in more on Alice herself, as she is being questioned a lot by Luther. The shots start to become slightly longer, emphasizing every single movement of the characters within the house. 

The editing within this extract overall is very back and forth, a lot of the time focusing around just one character, with the odd exception where both characters are featured for a dominant battle, breaking away from the stereotypical traits of men and women within TV Drama's, as the females within scenes would usually be considered as the "weaker" gender, therefore usually not getting as much attention as the men would do. 


Sound

The scene starts off with non-diegetic sound, as the first few seconds of the extract projects some music as Alice's face is revealed to the camera and the audience. The music appears to be very dark and dramatic, and this could perhaps emphasize Alice's character and personality within this extract. 

The scene then quickly changes into diegetic sound, as you can hear the two characters making conversation, alongside some background noise from cars and other street noise. When the characters talk about more serious topics, the background noise increases, almost mimicking them.

The scene then quickly changes into Alice's apartment, and at first absolutely nothing can be heard. There is no noise until the two begin to talk again, producing only diegetic noise once again. The scene carries on like this for a good 20 seconds, until Alice's words "black hole" are emphasized with more dramatic dark sounding music. The rest of the scene then projects both non-diegetic and diegetic sound, by focusing in on the two characters talking, with the dark music still playing over the top. 

As the scene reaches closer to the end, the music begins to project in sound level, mimicking the idea that their conversation will be left at a cliff hanger for the audience by Alice's words, again making her suspicious ways seem more powerful on camera in comparison to the man, ending the scene by saying "not if I get you first".

Mise En Scene



The clothing within this scene is seen to be very formal with both characters. Alice is seen wearing a purple coat and black trousers, whilst Luther is seen wearing a grey business suit. The fact that both characters are wearing very formal outfits, could suggest that both characters have a lot of power within the scene and within the TV Drama as a whole, as they are both dressed in expensive looking outfits, showing that they both could be very wealthy. 

This is again breaking the stereotypical traits when it comes to gender, as the female would usually be in something slightly less expensive than the male, as he would be seen as the more dominant/successful character within the TV Drama.  

Alice is seen to be wearing very natural coloured makeup, on her eyes and lips. Perhaps she has done this to mimic the idea that as she is the villain, she doesn't want everyone searching for her, and so she wears minimal makeup, because it causes less attraction. This could also suggest that the show is more represented for a male audience, as the female character isn't being focused on entirely in a presentation sense, as normally through the male gaze, females would be wearing a lot of makeup for the man's pleasure.

The scene seems to be taking place in a very run down location outside, on a bridge by some skyscrapers, over the top of a very busy road. Alice is seen to be carrying a bag with her, but nothing else is seen within this location. The fact that there is only one prop between two characters emphasizes again the idea of everything being very run down, as things would seem very suspicious if they were carrying around a lot of items of high value in a lower class area.

The scene progresses into Alice's house, where more props are seen within the shot. The location is now very more upper class in terms of possession, as Alice seems very well off with all of the items visible.The emphasis of a lot of books laid out on the table behind Alice, also suggests that she is a very intelligent character, as she is most likely to have read a lot within her past, making her a stronger character mentally. Also, the fact that Luther blends in very well with the scenery inside Alice's house could suggest that he isn't as important a character again as Alice, as he doesn't stand out as much as Alice does, based on the colours of his clothing.

Throughout the entire extract, the lighting appears to be very bright, as we can clearly see it is set in the daytime. The only time the lighting changes to a darker tone, is when the camera emphasizes the fact that there are ashes present. The setting doesn't go completely dark, but perhaps the slight change in light could mimic the idea of Alice being considered a dark character as she is the antagonist, however that's not discovered straight the way, as she is hiding in the light.

Wednesday, 7 October 2015

Mise-en-Scene

How does the mise-en-scene in your still help to construct the identity of the character(s)?

Consider:

  • Props
  • Costume
  • Lighting
  • Set Design
  • Location

Chosen Screenshot: TV Drama - The Vampire Diaries


This scene from The Vampire Diaries contains 4 characters from the TV Drama; 3 looking like they're in a tough situation (focus on the 2 men's struggling facial reactions), due to 1 of the characters being lifeless on the floor, with blood all around his neck/shoulder. 

The woman in this still appears to be holding a shovel in her left hand, and this could potentially hint towards the audience, that she might be planning to dig up the dead man that is currently on the floor in front of her. Their location appears to be in the middle of the woods, which in a stereotypical TV Drama/Movie could be seen as a 'dangerous' location, as a majority of bad incidents within these dramas, like death for example, occur in this type of location. 

The shovel could also potentially exaggerate the fact that the scene is currently during the day (we can tell this by the sunlight shining down on the characters), and that they need to hide the body in front of them immediately, as they could easily be seen from how bright the surroundings are in comparison to how it would be if this scene were to happen at night time. 

Also, the fact that the woman has her back towards the camera and is facing the 2 men in the scene, could suggest that she may be a character of lower power to the men, as she doesn't have the high privilege of actually facing the camera like the other characters. Note as well how the 2 men in the scene are stood up tall and straight, with their fists clenched, whereas the woman is stood hunched over with the shovel, looking like the weakest character out of the lot, as she has the tough job that is deciding whether or not to potentially bury the man that is placed in front of her.
  
The man on the left in this still appears to be wearing a blue buttoned up shirt, that is covered in one corner with blood. This may suggest that he is the one that potentially murdered the man on the floor, and this could explain why he is pulling a face which seems full of struggle, as from what we can see in the still, it looks like he is trying to figure out what to do with the person that he has in fact just killed. The fact that he has no props on him in this still, could potentially give away the idea that he is now powerless with his decisions after killing the man, as he is clueless what to do next, because he can't just go back and bring the man back to life. This could link into his personality and the idea that he is wearing a blue shirt, with blue giving away calm connotations.

The man on the right in this still appears to be stood extremely tall and proud, showing off his physical strengths by the way his body is positioned (focus on the direction he is facing, as his body faces the dead man, but his face is looking away). The way in which he is shown, shows similarities to how heroic figures look within movies and their trailers/posters e.t.c., and this could potentially suggest that he has the most power out of all the characters within this still. 

The fact that the man on the right is wearing black, could give off some connotations of death, which is linking into the fact that he is indeed part of a scene where there is a dead man right in front of him, who he could've potentially killed himself, or helped someone else kill.

Sunday, 4 October 2015

Music Video - Male Gaze

Analysis of the music video Fifth Harmony Feat. Kid Ink - Worth It.




Throughout this video, there are several scenes associated with "sexualized" dancing, "female empowerment" and "control" over the opposite gender.




Within the first 4 seconds we are presented with the group Fifth Harmony. They are seen, but only as their silhouettes in a long shot. This highlights their individual figures and curves, not giving away their entire appearance straight the way, but to potentially leave the viewer intrigued as to what they actually look like. This makes them more attractive towards the male eye, because their appearances are a mystery, and they want to know more about what they look like, which keeps them watching the video.





About 10 seconds in we see that Fifth Harmony begins to reveal their appearances, walking in from the side of the camera past a group of well dressed men. This shows a sign of women empowerment, as they walk along with strong independent facial expressions/body language (focus on the way that they move their arms and their large strides), and are wearing very professional business outfits, which could potentially be seen as a positive for both men and women watching. The camera starts off close up on the girls' shoes however, still leaving the audience wondering of their appearances, keeping the mystery alive. Their full appearances are finally revealed a few seconds afterwards, alongside the men in the video. This may make the men stare at the females on the screen, as they are taking control, which some men like about women, plus their outfits are clearly well thought out and match well, whilst showing a lot of skin at the same time. Each individual girl in the group clearly has their own sense of style, and this is extravagantly shown within the video, as they all highlight different colours and outfit shapes/styles e.g. Lauren Jauregui is dressed in an all black women's suit, whereas Dinah Jane Hansen is dressed in a slim black short sleeved leather vest, going alongside a slim white and red striped skirt. This may bring in a bigger male audience, as men with different pleasurable styles may take interest in the different girls due to how they are presented within their own styles. The female audience may look at this as a sign of body appreciation, rather than a sexual view, because they may want to look like the girls in the music video, and so watch with attitudes of inspiration, due to its aesthetically pleasing features. 





We are presented with a mid shot of the featuring rapper, Kid Ink, after being around 30 seconds into the video. His scene shows a slight twist in roles of who is in charge within the video, and this keeps in with the theme of the male gaze, because even though the ladies of Fifth Harmony are no longer being highlighted as the main roles, it shows a sign of strength within the male role around women, as he is being assisted by two well dressed attractive ladies that are introduced within his scene only. The male viewers may like to see this type of control, as through their eyes and through patriarchy, this would seem to be expected anyway, and so continue watching as a sign for strong, expected manhood being placed within the video. Plus they also have the bonus of the attractive women to look at on the side. 





Again we are given a long shot of Fifth Harmony after Kid Ink's section of the video ends. Here they are presented with dance moves that are inspired by Beyonce, another key lady in the music industry who features within the male gaze. They were inspired by Beyonce, as she is a major feminist in not just the music industry, but in the entire media industry as a whole, and she embraces her sexuality, rather than hiding from it or being ashamed of it, and this is the exact message that Fifth Harmony wanted to interpret for their female viewers. These dance moves are just typical routine moves, however from the view of the male gaze, the male may intepret these moves sexually, and be attracted to them. The girls are also "breaking the fourth wall" to show that it is all about them, averting back within the theme of women empowerment, and also keeping in direct view of the person watching the video. The girls can't see the viewer at the time of the music video being made, so to them it is more of a fantasy, staring at the camera, however in the male gaze, the intense stares at the camera male become sexualized, because it comes off attractive to a male viewer that they are being given a "look".























Throughout the remainder of the video, we encounter the members of Fifth Harmony individually being portrayed as "bossing around" their male companions in the video. They are presented constantly as very flirtatious through a males eyes, yet powerful over these companions overall, getting them to do their work, whilst distracting them at the same time with their body language, which again a man may interpret sexually. This interpretation that males may see through the video is emphasized a lot through long shots and mid shots, focusing mainly on the girls' arms and legs, as these parts of the body to them are being used most sexually throughout the music video's scenes, dancing and bossing around the males by pushing/kicking them about. They also see that the male characters are displayed a lot, showing intense sexual eye contact with the individual girls in their scenes, checking them out as they do these "sexual actions". However, a female may look at all of this again as a sign of inspiration and body appreciation, because these different camera shots show off the many features of each Fifth Harmony member, and viewers may find it aesthetically pleasing, as they strive to look like these girls in the video.



Finally, at the end of the music video, we are left with the girls of Fifth Harmony again "breaking the fourth wall", emphasizing once again that the video is all about themselves and women empowerment, leaving the viewer thinking of them in an empowering "women only" state as the video finishes with no men in sight. The last few seconds, switches from close ups to long shots, broadcasting a mixture of sexualized eye contact from a males perspective, with the girls and the viewer (as they are breaking the fourth wall during these moments close up, smirking at the camera), and a finishing male interpreted "sexualized" dance section, leaving us to connote what we see with sex, but also women in control of their own actions.




Overall, I would say that this music video could be interpreted as both "empowering" and "degrading" for women in the male gaze.

The music video can be interpreted as "empowering" as it's all about being a female boss in the workplace, whilst still being able to look good at the same time. It may also be seen as empowering, as the girls of Fifth Harmony are reversing the "typical roles of males and females" within music videos. Usually a male in a music video would be the one to stare at the camera "seductively" for a female viewer and take "complete dominance" within the video and with whoever may be watching the video, but Fifth Harmony have took this role and have completely switched it around, providing this for not just their male viewers, but their female viewers as well. Because of this "seductive technique" and their appearances, you would expect the target audience to be completely male, however, because they're "confident" and are "promoting their sexuality" in a positive light, they attract a large female audience too.

The music video can also be interpreted as "degrading" however, because even though the ladies of Fifth Harmony are presenting themselves as taking control and being in charge over the men, in the male gaze, the male viewers may say that they still have to use "sexual matters" like dancing and "flirtatious actions" around the men to do this successfully and gain full awareness, whereas a woman may simply say that it's just female characters being "confident" within their own bodies, and are doing whatever they like within the video, because they just want to promote the idea of "women empowerment" to their audience.

Wednesday, 23 September 2015

Tubechop - Camera shots, angles, movement and composition.

Basic Camera Shots

Extreme Long Shot/Establishing Shot
(Note how this shot starts off high, and then pans downwards and zooms further in as it progresses, rather than staying still and focusing on one area in particular for the amount of time the shot is present.)



Close Up

 

Long Shot




Extreme Close Up



Two Shot




Mid Shot

Camera shots, angles, movement and composition.

Basic Camera Shots





Basic Camera Angles






Camera Movements

Monday, 21 September 2015

Ex Machina - Research

A young programmer is selected to participate in a ground-breaking experiment in artificial intelligence by evaluating the human qualities of a breath-taking female A.I.



Age Rating:

  • UK - 15
  • US - R (UK equivalent to an 18)

Review Scores:

  • IMDB - 7.7/10
  • Metacritic - 78/100
  • Rotten Tomatoes - 92%


Content:

  • Sex & Nudity - 10/10

The woman lifts her leg and wraps it around the man. The scene ends and sex is implied.

A woman begins to undress for a man.

Discussion of attraction, flirtation, sexuality and penetrative sex with a robot.

A man jokes that oral sex was performed by a ghost in a film.

Conversation between two males about sexual intercourse. One asks the other if he wants to have intercourse with the main female lead & leads to about how it would be performed if such a case arises.

Mention of pornography.

Several uncovered humanoid robots shown, with breasts and genitals of actual actresses visible.

A female styled humanoid robot lies fully uncovered on a bed (very brief, non sexual with visible pubic hair).

A female styled robot examines it's uncovered flesh looking body in a mirror; nipples are seen.

A humanoid is seen on the ground in a very short that nearly reveals her flesh-looking buttocks.

There are long scenes where full frontal nudity of feminine humanoid robots in human looking flesh are shown. The appearance of flesh includes details of nipples and full frontal and backside nudity. Some of these humanoids are kept naked in closets. Graphic footage of them in partial human form and naked are also seen.

Because the robots are meant to be provocative of female sexuality in such a way that is fundamental and integral to the story line, their presence through out the entire movie is therefore a form of sexualization.

A female caresses her body in either a sexual manner or self realisation manner

A woman stands in front of a bunch of naked woman humanoid robots and she starts stripping artificial skin off of other naked women robots and placing on her own body.



  • Violence & Gore - 8/10

Body Count- 2 Humans and 1 Robot

A man cuts his arm with a razor blade and it bleeds extensively.

A man punches another in the face.

A man is stabbed to death by two different robots. Blood pools in his shirt.

Two robots are hit by another character, one is shown losing their limb and another is shown with a missing jaw after injury.

There is also emotional and psychologic violence towards the robots and it could be questioned whether these interactions depicted in the film therefore constitute a form sexual abuse, slavery and involuntary confinement; particularly in form of both sexual and domestic violence against women.



  • Profanity - 7/10


The f-word is said approximately 20 times, in both a sexual and non-sexual context.


  • Alcohol/Drugs/Smoking - 7/10

Characters are seen drinking alcohol.

A character gets extremely drunk several times.

There are conversations about drinking and hangovers.

A character encourages another character to get drunk.



  • Frightening/Intense Scenes - 5/10

A man cuts his arm, the scene is quite graphic.

A female robot peels back her skin to reveal machine parts.

Robots are beaten and have limbs damaged.

A man is stabbed twice by two different robots. Blood is seen.
A man is left to die in a locked room.

A humanoid is screaming and emotionally enraged at her physical and sexual confinement.




Producers


  • Eli Bush - Executive Producer
  • Caroline Levy - Line Producer
  • Andrew Macdonald - Producer
  • Allon Reich - Producer
  • Tessa Ross - Executive Producer
  • Scott Rudin - Executive Producer
  • Jason Sack - Associate Producer
  • Joanne Smith - Associate Producer
  • Jarle Tangen - Line Producer
Production Companies

  • DNA Films
  • Film4
  • Scott Rudin Productions
Director/Screen Writer

  • Alex Garland
Actors

  • Domhnall Gleeson - Caleb
  • Corey Johnson - Jay
  • Oscar Isaac - Nathan
  • Alicia Vikander - Ava
  • Sonoya Mizuno - Kyoko
  • Claire Selby - Lily
  • Symara A. Templeman - Jasmine
  • Gana Bayarsaikhan - Jade
  • Tiffany Pisani - Katya
  • Elina Alminas - Amber
Budget


  • $15,000,000 (estimated)
Screens Shown On


Weekend Gross
$3,690 (USA) (30 August 2015) (5 Screens)
$3,324 (USA) (
23 August 2015) (4 Screens)
$9,571 (USA) (
2 August 2015) (17 Screens)
$30,721 (USA) (
19 July 2015) (31 Screens)
$144,881 (USA) (
21 June 2015) (124 Screens)
$389,000 (USA) (
7 June 2015) (302 Screens)
$768,000 (USA) (
31 May 2015) (506 Screens)
$1,423,000 (USA) (
24 May 2015) (896 Screens)
$2,103,000 (USA) (
17 May 2015) (1,718 Screens)
$3,510,000 (USA) (
10 May 2015) (2,004 Screens)
$2,286,000 (USA) (
3 May 2015) (1,279 Screens)
$5,349,500 (USA) (
26 April 2015) (1,255 Screens)
$250,000 (USA) (
12 April 2015) (4 Screens)
€38,500 (Netherlands) (
3 May 2015) (8 Screens)


Box Office Figures


Opening Weekend
$5,349,500 (USA) (24 April 2015) (1,255 Screens)
$250,000 (USA) (12 April 2015) (4 Screens)
€38,500 (Netherlands) (3 May 2015) (8 Screens)


Gross
$25,440,971 (USA) (30 August 2015)
$25,434,333 (USA) (23 August 2015)
$25,405,058 (USA) (2 August 2015)
$25,361,484 (USA) (19 July 2015)
$25,233,155 (USA) (9 July 2015)
$24,954,673 (USA) (21 June 2015)
$24,330,000 (USA) (7 June 2015)
$23,587,000 (USA) (31 May 2015)
$21,947,000 (USA) (24 May 2015)
$19,566,000 (USA) (17 May 2015)
$16,705,000 (USA) (15 May 2015)
$15,762,000 (USA) (10 May 2015)
$10,924,000 (USA) (3 May 2015)
$6,827,930 (USA) (26 April 2015)
$250,000 (USA) (12 April 2015)
$36,659,611 (Worldwide) (9 July 2015)
$26,187,268 (Worldwide) (15 May 2015)
€89,727 (Netherlands) (6 May 2015)
$29,501 (Portugal) (15 May 2015)


Music (Composer of Score/Soundtrack)



  • The musical score for Ex Machina was composed by Ben Salisbury and Geoff Barrow.
  • A soundtrack album was released digitally on 20 January 2015, with an LP and Compact Disc UK release in February 2015 by Invada Records.
Additional songs featured in the film include:



  • "Enola Gay" by Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark
  • "Get Down Saturday Night" by Oliver Cheatham
  • "Husbands" by Savages
  • "Piano Sonata No 21 D. 960 in B-Flat Major" (first movement) by Franz Schubert
Marketing (teaser trailers, trailers, posters, websites e.t.c.)








Teaser Trailer:



Trailer:




Poster:




TV Spots:



Website:




SFX (special effects - technology used)

   Cameras:


















GoPro Hero 3 Black Edition
Sony CineAlta F65, Cooke Xtal Express, Kowa Prominar and Angenieux Optimo Lenses
Sony CineAlta PMW-F55, Cooke Xtal Express, Kowa Prominar and Angenieux Optimo Lenses

Cinematographic Process:

Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format)
J-D-C Scope (anamorphic) (source format)
Kowa Scope (anamorphic) (source format) (some scenes)

Much of Ex Machina takes place inside Nathan's house - an isolated building in the mountains filled with glass-lined walls. Production filmed on the Sony F-65 with anamorphic lenses, which would ultimately make for challenging plate tracking. On set, Vikander wore a gray wetsuit material costume covering most of her body. When visual effects replaced a section of the actor, the remaining parts were still the wetsuit material. Each setup involved an IBL take. Design and texturing of an Ava model continued at DNeg during principal photography, after which it was clear the rig had to be ‘astonishingly flexible’. To ensure the CG elements would perfectly match to the live action photography, Vikander was initially photobooth scanned in pre-production so her equivalent CG model could be built. Once the final costume was ready on set, the actress was scanned again and the model refined.


The film was shot like ordinary live action. There were no special effects, greenscreen, or tracking markers used during filming. All effects were done in post-production. To create Ava's robotic features they filmed the scenes both with and without actress Alicia Vikander's presence, which allowed them to capture the background behind her. The parts they wanted to keep, especially her hands and face, were then rotoscoped while the rest was digitally painted out and the background behind her restored. Camera- and body-tracking systems transferred Vikander's performance to the CGI robot's movements. In total there were about 800 VFX shots, of which 350 or so were robot shots.




Any Issues


"The very premise of Ex Machina sets up a battle of the sexes that has quickly proved to be controversial: As Caleb examines Ava, he begins to fall in love with her, and he’s increasingly horrified by the notion that Nathan is keeping this feminine creature as his prisoner and potential sex slave. Certainly, men don’t come off so well in the movie, which links their desire to create with the more primal male desire to procreate: In other words, it posits that the tech-bros who are driven to design humanlike robots may be thinking less with their brains and more with their ... well, you know. It’s Ex Machina’s treatment of women, though, that has already spurred the most think pieces.


The male characters in Ex Machina are blinkered and sexist in the way they relate to Ava (who's presented to both Caleb and the audience as a tantalizing mystery), but does their mere portrayal imply that the filmmaker approves of their actions, even unwittingly? It’s a notion that needles Garland, who understands all too well that a story designed to make you feel many things can be read by some as intending only one thing.


Ava read as post-gender, her circuits whirring underneath a body she’s been placed into but feels skeptical of. At the same time, she’s still just as hemmed in by male expectations as any real human woman would be: Kept imprisoned by Nathan in his remote hideaway, Ava is born into a literally patriarchal system that measures her worth based on how men respond to her, and it’s up to her to either exploit that system or learn how to circumvent it. When she dons a feminine wig and pours herself into a dress, she’s gauging her physical impact on Caleb; alone in her bedroom, the androgynous android studies images of other women that Nathan has provided, forming her notions of sexuality from the magazine cutouts and advertising images that are literally placed in front of her."